Lesson Planning Best Practices
Start With the End (Backward Design)
Most people plan lessons by picking activities. Better way? Start with what students need to be able to do at the end.
What It Means
Figure out your destination before you plan the route.
Why It Matters
Without a clear end goal, you might teach great activities that don't add up to real learning.
Real Example
A teacher wants students to "understand the Civil War." That's vague. Better: "Students will analyze three causes of the Civil War and explain how each contributed to the conflict." Now you know exactly what success looks like.
The Three Steps
Step 1: What do you want them to learn?
Be specific. "Students will be able to..." is your friend.
Step 2: How will you know they learned it?
Plan your assessment before you plan your lessons. What will prove they get it?
Step 3: What activities will get them there?
Now—and only now—plan the actual lesson activities.
Write Clear Objectives (Not Vague Hopes)
What is Backward Design?
Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe in their Understanding by Design (UbD) framework, backward design flips traditional planning logic: instead of starting with activities, start with the end goal.
The Three Stages
- Identify Desired Results: What should students understand and be able to do? What enduring understandings will persist beyond the lesson?
- Determine Acceptable Evidence: How will you know students have learned? What assessments will reveal understanding?
- Plan Learning Experiences: What activities, instruction, and resources will help students achieve the objectives and succeed on assessments?
Why It Works
Backward design ensures alignment between objectives, assessments, and instruction. Students aren't surprised by tests that don't match what they practiced, and teachers don't waste time on activities that don't serve learning goals.
Practical Application
Before planning activities, ask:
- "What's the big idea I want students to remember in five years?"
- "What misconceptions might students have about this concept?"
- "What evidence would prove they truly understand, not just memorized?"
Crafting Effective Learning Objectives
Characteristics of Strong Objectives
Learning objectives should be:
- Specific: "Analyze the causes of the Civil War" not "Learn about the Civil War"
- Measurable: Use action verbs from Bloom's Taxonomy (see below)
- Student-centered: Focus on what students will do, not what teacher will teach
- Achievable: Realistic for the time available and student readiness
- Standards-aligned: Connected to curriculum frameworks where applicable
Bloom's Taxonomy for Objective Writing
Use Bloom's revised taxonomy to ensure objectives target appropriate cognitive levels:
- Remember: Recall facts and basic concepts (list, define, identify)
- Understand: Explain ideas or concepts (describe, discuss, explain)
- Apply: Use information in new situations (implement, solve, demonstrate)
- Analyze: Draw connections and make distinctions (compare, contrast, categorize)
- Evaluate: Justify decisions or positions (critique, judge, defend)
- Create: Produce new or original work (design, construct, develop)
Best practice: Most lessons should include objectives at multiple levels, with higher-order thinking (analyze, evaluate, create) as the ultimate goal.
Examples of Well-Written Objectives
- Weak: "Students will learn about fractions."
Strong: "Students will compare and order fractions with unlike denominators using visual models and number lines." - Weak: "Students will understand photosynthesis."
Strong: "Students will diagram the process of photosynthesis, labeling inputs, outputs, and the role of chloroplasts." - Weak: "Students will read Chapter 3."
Strong: "Students will analyze character motivations in Chapter 3 by citing textual evidence and making inferences."
Research-Backed Instructional Strategies
1. Direct Instruction + Guided Practice
The Strategy: Teacher models skills explicitly, then guides student practice before releasing to independent work.
Research Support: Rosenshine's "Principles of Instruction" show explicit teaching with scaffolding produces strong learning gains, especially for new or complex material.
Implementation:
- I Do: Demonstrate the skill with think-aloud narration
- We Do: Work through examples together, gradually reducing support
- You Do: Students practice independently while teacher circulates
2. Retrieval Practice
The Strategy: Students actively recall information from memory rather than passively re-reading or reviewing.
Research Support: Cognitive psychology shows retrieval strengthens memory more than additional study time ("testing effect").
Implementation:
- Begin lessons with "do now" questions reviewing previous content
- Use exit tickets requiring recall of key concepts
- Include low-stakes quizzes throughout units
- Have students explain concepts to partners without notes
3. Spaced Repetition
The Strategy: Review material multiple times over increasing intervals rather than massing practice in one session.
Research Support: Spacing effect research shows distributed practice leads to better long-term retention than cramming.
Implementation:
- Spiral previously taught concepts into new lessons
- Include cumulative review questions on assessments
- Revisit core skills at increasing intervals (1 day, 1 week, 1 month)
4. Worked Examples and Faded Scaffolding
The Strategy: Provide complete worked examples, then gradually remove support as students gain competence.
Research Support: Cognitive load theory shows novices learn better from studying examples than solving problems independently.
Implementation:
- Show 1-2 fully worked examples
- Provide partially completed examples (students fill in missing steps)
- Finally, present problems with no scaffolding
5. Formative Assessment
The Strategy: Check for understanding throughout the lesson and adjust instruction based on evidence.
Research Support: Black and Wiliam's research shows formative assessment can double the speed of learning.
Implementation:
- Use thumbs up/down or colored cards for quick checks
- Circulate during independent work, noting patterns of errors
- Ask strategic questions to probe understanding (not just yes/no)
- Use exit tickets to assess lesson objective mastery
Effective Lesson Structure
Opening (5-10 minutes)
Purpose: Hook students, activate prior knowledge, and set clear expectations.
Components:
- Hook/Engagement: Question, image, demonstration, or problem that piques curiosity
- Objective Sharing: Tell students what they'll learn and why it matters
- Prior Knowledge Activation: Quick review of prerequisite concepts
Instruction/Exploration (15-25 minutes)
Purpose: Deliver new content through modeling, explanation, or guided discovery.
Components:
- Direct Teaching: Explicit instruction with examples and non-examples
- Modeling: Demonstrate the skill with think-aloud
- Checking for Understanding: Strategic questioning and observation
Guided Practice (10-15 minutes)
Purpose: Students try skills with teacher support.
Components:
- Collaborative problem-solving or activities
- Teacher circulates, provides feedback, addresses misconceptions
- Scaffolding gradually reduced as students show competence
Independent Practice (10-20 minutes)
Purpose: Students apply skills autonomously.
Components:
- Individual work at appropriate challenge level
- Teacher monitors and provides targeted assistance
- Early finishers have extension activities
Closure (5 minutes)
Purpose: Solidify learning and preview next steps.
Components:
- Summarize: Review key concepts (student-led when possible)
- Exit Ticket: Quick formative assessment of objective mastery
- Preview: Connect to tomorrow's lesson
Differentiation Strategies
Differentiation means tailoring instruction to meet diverse student needs without creating entirely separate lessons for every learner.
Differentiate Content (What Students Learn)
- Tiered assignments: Same objective, varying complexity levels
- Compacting: Pre-assess and excuse students from content they've mastered
- Flexible grouping: Form groups based on readiness, interest, or learning profile
Differentiate Process (How Students Learn)
- Multiple modalities: Offer visual, auditory, and kinesthetic options
- Learning stations: Students rotate through activities at different levels
- Scaffolding tools: Provide graphic organizers, sentence frames, or manipulatives for struggling students
Differentiate Product (How Students Demonstrate Learning)
- Choice boards: Students select from menu of ways to show mastery
- Varied assessment formats: Written, oral, visual, or performance options
- Flexible criteria: Core requirements with optional challenge elements
Practical Differentiation Tips
- Start small: Differentiate one element (content, process, or product), not everything at once
- Use data: Base differentiation on formative assessment, not assumptions
- Leverage technology: Adaptive learning programs can personalize practice
- Flexible grouping: Change groups regularly—avoid fixed "high, medium, low" labels
Efficient Planning Practices
Prioritize Backwards
Spend the most time on objectives and assessment design. If these are clear, activities flow logically.
Reuse and Adapt
Don't reinvent the wheel. Curate a library of successful lessons and modify for new contexts.
Collaborate
Plan with grade-level or subject-area colleagues. Divide and conquer: each person plans one unit deeply, then shares.
Use Templates
Standardized lesson plan templates save time and ensure you don't forget key components.
Leverage AI Tools
AI platforms like Kheight can generate initial drafts of lessons, freeing time for customization and refinement. See AI Lesson Planning Guide for details.
Common Lesson Planning Mistakes to Avoid
1. Activity-Centered Planning
Mistake: Starting with "This activity looks fun!" rather than learning objectives.
Fix: Always begin with "What should students learn?" Then select activities that serve that goal.
2. Vague Objectives
Mistake: "Students will understand photosynthesis."
Fix: "Students will explain the role of chlorophyll in converting light energy to chemical energy during photosynthesis."
3. Ignoring Assessment Until the End
Mistake: Planning instruction, then figuring out assessment as an afterthought.
Fix: Design assessment immediately after objectives (backward design). This ensures alignment.
4. Underestimating Time
Mistake: Planning too many activities for the available time.
Fix: Estimate time for each component, build in buffer, and have backup plans for both finishing early and running long.
5. One-Size-Fits-All Instruction
Mistake: Assuming all students need the same level of support and challenge.
Fix: Build in at least one differentiation strategy per lesson (tiered task, choice, or flexible grouping).
Further Reading and Resources
Essential Books
- "Understanding by Design" by Wiggins & McTighe — The definitive guide to backward design
- "Principles of Instruction" by Barak Rosenshine — Research-based teaching practices
- "Make It Stick" by Brown, Roediger & McDaniel — Cognitive science for lasting learning
- "The Differentiated Classroom" by Carol Ann Tomlinson — Strategies for meeting diverse needs
Online Resources
Related Kheight Resources
- AI Lesson Planning Guide — How to use AI for effective lesson planning
- What Is AI Lesson Planning? — Complete guide to AI-powered lesson planning
- Evidence-Based Curriculum Design — Research-backed curriculum development principles
- Teacher Workload Statistics — Data on teacher workload and time allocation
Streamline Your Lesson Planning
Apply these best practices effortlessly with Kheight's AI-powered lesson planning platform, built on research-backed pedagogy.
Get Started Free